Asbestos Exposure at Ohio State University — Columbus, Ohio — Ohio EPA NESHAP abatement: Former Worker Claims

If you worked at Ohio State University during renovation projects and have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, an asbestos attorney Ohio can help. Ohio’s two-year filing deadline starts at diagnosis—not exposure. Act now.


ohiomesothelioma.com | Serving Ohio Asbestos Victims

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or another asbestos-related disease, contact a qualified asbestos cancer lawyer Cleveland or elsewhere in Ohio immediately.


⚠️ OHIO FILING DEADLINE WARNING — ACT NOW

Ohio law gives mesothelioma and asbestos disease victims only TWO YEARS to file a lawsuit after diagnosis — under Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10. The clock starts running from your diagnosis date, not from when you were exposed. If you were diagnosed months ago and have not yet spoken with an asbestos attorney Ohio, you may already be running out of time.

Do not wait. Once Ohio’s two-year filing window closes, it closes permanently — and no court can restore your right to compensation, no matter how strong your case. Call an asbestos cancer lawyer or mesothelioma attorney today.

Asbestos trust fund claims and civil lawsuits can be pursued simultaneously in Ohio, and most trust funds have no hard filing deadline — but trust fund assets are finite and depleting every year. The sooner you file, the better your recovery potential.


If You Worked at Ohio State University During Renovation, You May Have Been Exposed to Asbestos

Ohio State University’s 400-plus buildings have been under continuous renovation since the 1920s. During that period, asbestos-containing materials were built into virtually every mechanical system, floor, ceiling, and pipe on campus. Tradespeople, maintenance workers, and contractors who worked on those projects may have breathed asbestos fibers without knowing it — and without any protection. If you or a family member worked at OSU and has since developed mesothelioma, asbestosis, or lung cancer, this article explains what allegedly happened, where the asbestos-containing materials reportedly came from, and what legal remedies may be available under Ohio law.

Ohio imposes a strict two-year statute of limitations on asbestos personal injury and wrongful death claims under Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10. That clock begins running from the date of diagnosis — not the date of exposure. Mesothelioma moves fast. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease connected to OSU renovation work, contacting a qualified mesothelioma lawyer Ohio today — not next week, not next month — is the only way to protect your right to compensation.


What Was Ohio State University’s Asbestos Problem?

A Campus Built During Peak Asbestos Use in Ohio

Ohio State University, founded in 1870 and located in Columbus, Ohio, began large-scale building construction during the early twentieth century — precisely when asbestos-containing materials became standard in American institutional construction. The university’s most intensive building campaigns ran from 1920 through the mid-1970s, the same period when asbestos use in construction peaked nationally and throughout Ohio’s industrial economy.

Ohio was among the nation’s most heavily industrialized states during this era, and the asbestos-containing products reportedly used at OSU were manufactured and distributed through supply chains that ran directly through Ohio’s industrial heartland. Manufacturers including Johns-Manville, Owens-Illinois (headquartered in Toledo, Ohio), Armstrong World Industries, Georgia-Pacific, Celotex, and W.R. Grace actively promoted asbestos-containing products to institutional builders throughout this period. Ohio institutions like OSU, as well as major industrial facilities across the state — including steel mills in Youngstown and Cleveland, rubber plants in Akron, and auto assembly plants in Lorain — all reportedly drew from the same regional supply of asbestos-containing materials during the construction and maintenance era.

Builders chose asbestos-containing materials because they were:

  • Fire-resistant and thermally insulating
  • Inexpensive and widely available through Ohio-area distributors
  • Aggressively marketed by major manufacturers, including Ohio-based Owens-Illinois
  • Compatible with virtually every building system

Where Asbestos-Containing Materials May Have Been Present at OSU

Workers at OSU renovation projects may have encountered asbestos-containing materials in the following systems and applications:

Mechanical and Steam Systems:

  • Pipe insulation products including block insulation, calcium silicate wrap, and asbestos-containing cements allegedly manufactured by Johns-Manville and Owens-Illinois (documented in NESHAP abatement records)
  • Boiler insulation and refractory lining, including products such as Thermobestos and similar high-temperature insulation blankets
  • Hot water tank insulation materials
  • Underground and above-ground steam distribution piping throughout the Columbus campus, reportedly insulated with products from Johns-Manville and Owens-Illinois
  • Valve and flange gaskets and packing materials, reportedly manufactured by Garlock Sealing Technologies, Crane Co., and Combustion Engineering (per asbestos trust fund claim data)

Building Envelope and Interior Materials:

  • Floor tiles and asbestos-containing mastic adhesives, including vinyl asbestos tiles (VAT) allegedly from Celotex, Armstrong World Industries, and Georgia-Pacific
  • Ceiling tiles and suspended ceiling systems, reportedly containing asbestos-containing materials from Johns-Manville and Armstrong World Industries
  • Spray-applied fireproofing on structural steel and concrete, including Monokote products and similar asbestos-containing spray coatings (per published trial records involving similar institutional buildings)
  • Textured ceiling coatings and joint compound, potentially containing asbestos-containing materials from Johns-Manville and Georgia-Pacific
  • Roofing materials and built-up roofing systems allegedly from Johns-Manville and Owens-Illinois

Electrical and Mechanical Equipment:

  • Electrical wire insulation and panel board materials reportedly containing asbestos
  • HVAC duct wrap insulation, reportedly including products with trade names such as Aircell and Unibestos
  • Sealants and gaskets throughout mechanical systems, reportedly from Garlock Sealing Technologies and W.R. Grace

Trades Most Likely to Face Asbestos Exposure at OSU

Workers in High-Risk Occupations During Campus Renovation

Workers in the following trades or occupational roles at OSU renovation projects may have been exposed to asbestos-containing materials. Many of the tradespeople who worked at OSU during renovation projects were members of Columbus-area and statewide Ohio union locals — some of the same locals that represented workers at Cleveland-Cliffs Steel, Republic Steel in Youngstown, Goodyear and B.F. Goodrich in Akron, and Ford’s Lorain Assembly Plant:

High-Exposure Trades:

  • Heat and frost insulators, including members of Heat and Frost Insulators Local 1 (Columbus) and Asbestos Workers Local 3 (Cleveland), some of whom may have worked on OSU projects or similar central Ohio institutional construction
  • Pipefitters and steamfitters, including members of Plumbers and Pipefitters UA Local 562 (Columbus) and Local 268
  • Boilermakers, including members of Boilermakers Local 900, which represented workers at Ohio industrial and institutional facilities throughout the region
  • Electricians
  • Sheet metal workers (HVAC)
  • Carpenters and drywall workers
  • Laborers and demolition workers

Medium-Exposure Occupations:

  • OSU facilities and maintenance staff (all crafts)
  • HVAC technicians
  • Plumbers and mechanics
  • General construction and renovation workers

Potential Exposure Through Proximity:

  • Supervisors and foremen
  • Safety personnel
  • Building inspectors
  • Architects and engineers on-site during construction

Ohio Union Workers with Multi-Site Asbestos Exposure

Ohio’s union workforce was highly mobile during the mid-twentieth century. Tradespeople who worked at OSU renovation projects often also worked at other Ohio industrial sites where asbestos-containing materials were reportedly pervasive. Workers who were members of USW Local 1307 in Lorain, Boilermakers Local 900, or other Ohio trade union locals may have accumulated asbestos exposure across multiple Ohio work sites — including OSU — over the course of a career. Franklin County Common Pleas Court in Columbus is an appropriate venue for asbestos lawsuit claims arising from OSU renovation work, and multi-site cumulative exposure histories are fully cognizable under Ohio asbestos litigation standards.

If you fall into any of these categories and have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or an asbestos-related disease, consult an Ohio asbestos attorney immediately. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer Ohio can evaluate your exposure history, identify every responsible defendant and trust fund, and protect your rights under Ohio’s two-year filing deadline. That deadline does not move for anyone.


How Workers May Have Encountered Asbestos-Containing Materials at OSU

Common Exposure Scenarios at University Renovation Projects

Workers at OSU renovation projects may have been exposed to asbestos-containing materials through several recurring work activities:

Insulation Removal and Disturbance:

  • Insulators cutting, scraping, and removing asbestos-containing pipe insulation products allegedly from Johns-Manville, Owens-Illinois, and Owens Corning in mechanical rooms and along steam distribution lines throughout the Columbus campus
  • Pipefitters and boilermakers working adjacent to asbestos-containing insulation, including products branded as Kaylo and Thermobestos
  • Workers disturbing settled asbestos dust on pipes, equipment, and surfaces without respiratory protection

Demolition and Renovation Work:

  • Carpenters and laborers tearing out walls, ceilings, and floors containing asbestos-containing tiles allegedly from Armstrong World Industries, Celotex, and Georgia-Pacific, and joint compound products
  • Asbestos-containing ceiling tiles, floor tiles, and mastic adhesives allegedly disturbed without prior identification or abatement
  • Spray-applied fireproofing products, including Monokote spray-on products, reportedly disturbed during structural renovation work without containment

Maintenance and Repair Activities:

  • OSU facilities staff performing routine maintenance on pipe systems that may have contained asbestos-containing insulation from Johns-Manville and Owens-Illinois
  • Boiler and heating system maintenance allegedly generating asbestos dust from insulation and refractory materials
  • Drilling, cutting, or routing new systems through walls and ceilings reportedly containing asbestos-containing drywall compounds from Gold Bond (Georgia-Pacific brand) and other manufacturers

Steam Distribution System Work:

  • Maintenance and renovation of OSU’s central steam plant and campus-wide underground and building-level piping throughout the Columbus campus
  • This infrastructure was allegedly insulated with asbestos-containing materials from Johns-Manville and Owens-Illinois during the construction and maintenance era
  • Workers may have been exposed to asbestos-containing materials during routine valve replacement, pipe repair, and system modifications

Pre-1980s Work Without Protective Measures:

  • Renovation work performed before asbestos awareness, regulation, and abatement requirements took effect
  • Workers allegedly disturbed asbestos-containing materials with no respiratory protection, no dust controls, and no advance identification of asbestos presence
  • Cumulative exposure from multiple small disturbances across many years of campus work in Columbus

The diseases caused by this kind of exposure — mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer — typically do not appear until 20 to 50 years after the work was performed. That latency period is exactly why Ohio’s discovery rule matters: the two-year filing clock under Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10 starts at diagnosis, not at the last day you worked on campus. But it does start — and it does not stop. If you have recently been diagnosed, your window to act is already open and closing. Call an asbestos attorney Ohio today.


Data Sources

Information about facility equipment, industrial materials, and occupational records referenced on this page is drawn from publicly available sources where applicable, including:

Ohio Boiler and Pressure Vessel Registry — Equipment on File

The following boilers and pressure vessels were registered with the Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Industrial Compliance for this facility. These records are public documents and have been used in asbestos exposure litigation to document the presence of industrial heating equipment at this site.

Reg #ManufacturerYr BuiltTypeMAWP (PSI)LocationInspectorCert Date
110230Erie City1957WT205Boiler Room - Power PlantR Dewitt Char940824

Source: Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Industrial Compliance — Boiler and Pressure Vessel Program. Public record.


For informational purposes only. Not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading this page. © 2026 Rights Watch Media Group LLC — Disclaimer · Privacy · Terms · Copyright